Where to Find in Us Micrel Pharmaceutical Products

Authored past Kit up Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,

You asked for it, so we made it. A collection of all the arguments you'll ever need.

We get much of e-mails and nonpublic messages along these lines"cause you have a source for X?" or"can you distributor point me to mask studies?" or"I know I saw a graph for mortality, but I can't witness IT any longer". And we realize, it's been a long 18 months, and there are so many statistics and Book of Numbers to try and keep straight in your head.

Thusly, to bargain with all these requests, we decided to stool a bullet-bristle-pointed and sourced list for complete the key points. A cardinal-stop-shop.

Here are key facts and sources about the alleged "epidemic", that volition help you get a grasp on what has happened to the world since January 2020, and help oneself you clear up any of your friends World Health Organization mightiness be tranquil cornered in the Novel Normal befog: "Covid deaths" – Lockdowns – PCR Tests – "well infection" – Ventilators – Masks – Vaccines – Deception &adenylic acid; Foreknowledge

*  *  *

PART I: "COVID DEATHS" & MORTALITY

1. The survival rate of "Covid" is all over 99%. Government activity medical experts went tabu of their way to underline, from the beginning of the pandemic, thatthe vast majority of the universe are not in any danger from Covid.

Almost entirely studies on the infection-human death ratio (IFR) of Covid have returned results between 0.04% and 0.5%. Meaning Covid's survival rate is at to the lowest degree 99.5%.

*

2. There has been NO unusual excess death rate. The military press has called 2020 the UK's "deadliest year since reality warfare two", just this is misleading because information technology ignores the heavy increase in the universe since that time. A more reasonable statistical measure of mortality is Age-Standardised Mortality Rate (ASMR):

By this measure, 2020 isn't even the worst year for mortalitysince 2000, In fact since 1943only 9 years have been better than 2020.

Likewise, in the US the ASMR for 2020 is only at 2004 levels:

For a detailed partitioning of how Covid taken mortality crosswise Western European Economic Community and the US click here. What increases in mortality we have seen could embody attributable to non-Covid causes [facts 7, 9 & 19].

*

3. "Covid decease" counts are artificially pretentious. Countries around the ball have been defining a "Covid death" A a"Deathby any cause within 28/30/60 days of a positivist test".

Health care officials from Italy, Germany, the UK, US, Northern Ireland and others have entirely admitted to this practice:

Removing whatsoever preeminence between lastof Covid, and dying of something elseafterward testing positive for Covid will naturally lead to o'er-counting of "Covid deaths". British pathologist Dr Lav Lee was warning of this "material terminated-underestimate" as wee as last spring. Other mainstream sources have reported it, too.

Considering the vast percentage of "asymptomatic" Covid infections [14], the well-known prevalence of serious comorbidities [fact 4] and the prospective for false-supportive tests [fact 18], this renders the Covid last numbers an extremely dangerous statistic.

*

4. The vast majority of covid deaths have serious comorbidities. In March 2020, the Italian political science published statistics showing 99.2% of their "Covid deaths" had at the least one serious comorbidity.

These enclosed cancer, heart disease, dementia, Alzheimer's, kidney failure and diabetes (among others). Over 50% of them hadthree surgery more than serious pre-existing conditions.

This design has delayed all told other countries over the course of the "epidemic". An October 2020 FOIA request to the UK's ONS revealed to a lesser degree 10% of the official "Covid death" count at that time had Covid as the sole cause of death.

*

5. Modal eld of "Covid death" is greater than the norm life expectancy. The average age of a "Covid death" in the UK is 82.5 years. In Italia it's 86. Deutschland, 83. Switzerland, 86. Canada, 86. The US, 78, Australia, 82.

In almost all cases the median age of a "Covid death"is higher than the national life expectancy.

As such, for most of the world, the "pandemic" has had niggling-to-no impact on lifespan expectancy. Contrast this with the Spanish flu, which saw a 28% drop in life anticipation in the US in just over a year. [source]

*

6. Covid mortality exactly mirrors the self-generated mortality curve. Statistical studies from the Britain and India have shown that the curve for "Covid death" follows the twist for foretold fatality rate about exactly:

The take chances of death "from Covid" follows, almost exactly, your background risk of dying in general.

The small step-up for some of the older historic period groups can represent accounted for by past factors.[facts 7, 9 & 19]

*

7. There has been a massive increase in the use of "outlaw" DNRs. Watchdogs and government agencies take in rumored huge increases in the use of Do Not Resuscitate Orders (DNRs) over the last twenty months.

In the U.S., hospitals advised "universal DNRs" for whatsoever patient who tested positive for Covid, and whistleblowing nurses have admitted the DNR scheme was abused in Fres York.

In the UK there was an "unprecdented" rise in "illegal" DNRs for disabled people, GP surgeries transmitted unstylish letters to not-terminal patients recommending they sign DNR orders, whilst other doctors signed "blanket DNRs" forentire nursing homes.

A read through with by Sheffield Univerisity recovered terminated third of every last "suspected" Covid patients had a DNR attached to their file inside 24 hours of hospital admission.

Blanket use of coerced or illegal DNR orders could calculate for any increases in mortality in 2020/21.[Facts 2 & 6]

*  *  *

Partly II: LOCKDOWNS

8. Lockdowns Doctor of Osteopathy not prevent the spread of disease. On that point is little to nary evidence lockdowns take up any impact on limiting "Covid deaths". If you compare regions that locked down to regions that did non, you can see no pattern at all.

"Covid deaths" in Everglade State (no lockdown) vs California (lockdown)

"Covid deaths" in Kingdom of Sweden (no lockdown) vs U.K. (lockdown)

*

9. Lockdowns pop people. There is strong evidence that lockdowns – through social, economic and other public health damage – are deadlier than the "virus".

Dr St. David Nabarro, World Health Organization special envoy for Covid-19 delineate lockdowns as a "global catastrophe" in October 2020:

We inthe World Wellness Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of the virus[…] it seems we may have a doubling of cosmos poverty by future yr. We may easily have at least a doubling of child malnutrition […] This is a terrible, ghastly global catastrophe."

A UN report from April 2020 warned of 100,000s of children being killed by the efficient impact of lockdowns, while tens of millions more side possible poverty and dearth.

Unemployment, impoverishment, felo-de-se, alcoholism, drug use and other social/mental health crises are spiking all over the global. While missed and delayed surgeries and screenings are going to come across augmented mortality from heart disease, Crab et al. in the near future.

The impact of lockdown would answer for for the small increases in redundant mortality [Facts 2 & 6]

*

10. Hospitals were never outstandingly over-burdened. the main argument used to champion lockdowns is that "flattening the curve" would keep a rapid influx of cases and protect healthcare systems from founder. But most healthcare systems were never roughly collapse in the least.

In Process 2020 information technology was reported that hospitals in Spain and Italia were over-flowing with patients, but this happens every flu season. In 2017 Spanish hospitals were at 200% capacity, and 2015 byword patients sleeping in corridors. A paper JAMA paper from March 2020 found that European nation hospitals"typically run at 85-90% capacity in the winter months".

In the UK, the NHS is regularly extended to breaking point over the winter.

As part of their Covid policy, the NHS announced in Spring of 2020 that they would be"re-organizing hospital capacity in new ways to deal Covid and non-Covid patients separately" and that "as result hospitals will experience capacitance pressures at lower overall occupancy rates than would previously have been the case."

This means they removed thousands of beds.  During an alleged deadly pandemic, they reduced the maximum occupancy of hospitals. Disdain this, the NHS never felt press beyond your typical grippe temper, and at times actually had 4x more empty beds than convention.

In both the UK and US millions were spent on temporary emergency hospitals that were ne'er used.

*  *  *

PART III: PCR TESTS

11. PCR tests were not designed to diagnose malady. The Inverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Range Response (RT-PCR) test is delineated in the media as the "gold standard" for Covid diagnosis. But the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended it to be put-upon atomic number 3 a diagnostic tool, and aforementioned so publicly:

PCR is equitable a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something knocked out of something. It doesn't Tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with was passing to hurt you or anything like that."

*

12. PCR Tests have a history of being wide of the mark and treacherous. The "gold standard" PCR tests for Covid are known to produce a good deal of false-positive results, by reacting to DNA material that is not taxon to Sars-Cov-2.

A Chinese canvas found the similar patient could get two variant results from the same test along the same twenty-four hours. In Germany, tests are known to have reacted to common cold viruses. A 2006 study establish PCR tests for incomparable virus responded to other viruses too. In 2007, a reliance on PCR tests resulted in an "outbreak" of Whooping Cough that never actually existed. Some tests in the US even reacted to the negative control sample.

The late Prexy of Tanzania, Whoremaster Magufuli, submitted samples caprine animal, papaya and efferent anele for PCR examination, all came back confident for the virus.

Every bit early as February of 2020 experts were admitting the test was unreliable. Dr Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences told Chinese res publica television"The accuracy of the tests is only 30-50%". The Australian government activity's own website claimed"There is limited evidence forthcoming to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests." And a Portuguese tribunal subordinate that PCR tests were"unreliable" and should not be used for diagnosis.

You can read detailed breakdowns of the failings of PCR tests present, here and here.

*

13. The CT values of the PCR tests are excessively high. PCR tests are course in cycles, the routine of cycles you use to get your result is known as your "cycle threshold" or CT esteem. Kary Mullis said:"If you have to perish much 40 cycles[…]there is something badly wrong with your PCR."

The MIQE PCR guidelines agree, stating:"[CT] values high than 40 are suspect because of the understood low efficiency and in the main should not Be reported," Dr Fauci himself even admitted anything complete 35 cycles is about never culturable.

Dr Juliet Morrison, virologist at the University of CA, Riverbank, told the New York Times:Whatever test with a cps threshold in a higher place 35 is too sensitive…I'm shocked that people would think that 40 [cycles] could represent a positive…A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35″.

In the indistinguishable article Dr Michael Mina, of the Harvard School of Public Wellness, said the limit should beryllium 30, and the author goes on to point out that reduction the CT from 40 to 30 would have reduced "covid cases" in whatsoever states past as much as 90%.

The CDC's own data suggests no sample over 33 cycles could be cultured, and Germany's Henry Martyn Robert Robert Koch Institute says nothing over 30 cycles is possible to atomic number 4 infectious.

Despite this, it is known almost all the labs in the US are running their tests at least 37 cycles and sometimes as high as 45. The NHS "standard operating procedure" for PCR tests rules set the limit at 40 cycles.

Based happening what we have it away approximately the CT values, the majority of PCR essa results are at best questionable.

*

14. The WHO (Twice) Admitted PCR tests produced false positives.In December 2020 WHO issue a briefing memoranda on the PCR process instructing labs to be wary of high CT values causing false positive results:

when specimens return a high Ct value, it way that many cycles were required to detect virus. In few circumstances, the distinction between backdrop noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.

Then, in January 2021, the WHO released another memo, this prison term warning that "asymptomatic" positive PCR tests should be re-tried because they might beryllium false positives:

Where examine results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the Lapplander or different NAT technology.

*

15. The scientific basis for Covid tests is confutative. The genome of the Severe acute respiratory syndrome-Cov-2 computer virus was supposedly sequenced by Chinese scientists in Dec 2019, then published connected January 10th 2020. Less than 2 weeks later, German virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) had allegedly used the genome to create assays for PCR tests.

They wrote a paper,Signal detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) away period RT-PCR, which was submitted for publishing connected January 21st 2020, and past accepted on January 22nd. Meaning the paper wasallegedly "match-reviewed" in inferior than 24 hours. A process that typically takes weeks.

Since and then, a consortium of over forty life scientists has petitioned for the withdrawal of the paper, writing a extended report particularization 10 major errors in the paper's methodological analysis.

They have also requested the release of the journal's peer-review report, to try out the paper actually did pass across the peer-retrospect process. The diary has yet to comply.

The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of all Covid PCR test in the world. If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is likewise questionable.

*  *  *

PART IV: "ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION"

16. The majority of Covid infections are "symptomless". From as early as March 2020, studies through in Italy were suggesting 50-75% of positive Covid tests had no symptoms. Other UK field from August 2020 found as more than as 86% of "Covid patients"experienced no infectious agent symptoms at all.

It is literally impossible to tell the dispute between an "asymptomatic grammatical case" and a false-positive try answer.

*

17. Thither is very little evidence support the supposed danger of "asymptomatic transmission". In June 2020, Dr Maria Vanguard Kerkhove, forefront of the WHO's emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said:

From the data we have, it tranquil seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,"

A meta-analysis of Covid studies, published aside Journal of the American Medical exam Association (JAMA) in December 2020, found that asymptomatic carriers had a to a lesser degree 1% opportunity of infecting people within their home. Another study, done connected grippe in 2009, found:

…limited evidence to suggest the importance of [asymptomatic] transmission. The role of asymptomatic or presymptomatic grippe-contaminative individuals in disease transmittal may let been overestimated…"

Given the far-famed flaws of the PCR tests, many "asymptomatic cases" may be false positives.[fact 14]

*  *  *

PART V: VENTILATORS

18. Breathing is NOT a treatment for respiratory viruses. Automatonlike ventilation is not, and never has been, recommended discussion for respiratory tract infection of any gracious. In the early days of the pandemic, many doctors came forward questioning the use of ventilators to treat "Covid".

Writing in The Spectator, Dr Matt Richard Strauss explicit:

Ventilators do non cure some disease. They stern fill your lungs with atmosphere when you find out yourself incapable to do so yourself. They are associated with lung diseases in the public's knowingness, but this is non in fact their most popular or nigh appropriate application.

German Pulmonologist Dr Thomas Voshaar, chairman of Association of Pneumatological Clinics said:

When we read the first studies and reports from China and Italy, we now asked ourselves wherefore intubation was so general there.This contradicted our clinical experience with viral pneumonia.

Despite this, the WHO, CDC, ECDC and NHS all "recommended" Covid patients be ventilated instead of using not-invasive methods.

This was not a Graeco-Roman deity policy designed to best treat the patients, but rather to reduce the hypothetical spread of Covid past preventing patients from exhaling aerosol droplets.

*

19. Ventilators killed people. Putting somebody WHO is suffering from flu, pneumonia, degenerative clogging pulmonary disease, or whatsoever other condition which restricts breathing operating theater affects the lungs, will not alleviate any of those symptoms. In point of fact, it will almost sure as shooting pull through worse, and will kill many an of them.

Intubation tubes are a source of potential a infection titled "ventilator-related pneumonia", which studies show affects up to 28% of whol people put connected ventilators, and kills 20-55% of those infected.

Mechanical ventilation is also detrimental to the physical structure of the lungs, resulting in "ventilator-induced lung harm", which can dramatically wallop lineament of life, and even result in death.

Experts estimate 40-50% of ventilated patients break down, regardless of their disease. Or so the earthly concern, between 66 and 86% of completely "Covid patients" put on on ventilators died.

According to the "undercover suckle", ventilators were beingness used soh improperly in Greater New York, they were destroying patients' lungs:

This policy was negligence at best, and potentially deliberate murder at last. This abuse of ventilators could account for any increase in mortality in 2020/21 [Facts 2 & 6]

*  *  *

PART VI: MASKS

20. Masks assume't sour. Leastwise a dozen knowledge domain studies have shown that masks do nothing to stop the feast of respiratory viruses.

One meta-analysis published away the CDC in Crataegus oxycantha 2020 found"nary significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks".

Another study with over 8000 subjects found masks"did not appear to be rough-and-ready against research lab-confirmed micro-organism respiratory infections nor against objective respiratory infection."

There are literally too many to quotation mark them all, but you bum read them: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Or read a summary aside SPR here.

While both studies have been done claiming to show mask work for Covid, they are wholly seriously flawed. One relied on ego-reported surveys A information. Another was so badly designed a panel of experts demand it be withdrawn. A fractional was withdrawn afterwards its predictions tried entirely incorrect.

The WHO commissioned their own meta-analysis in the Lance, but that study looked only at N95 masks and only if in hospitals. [For entire run down along the malfunctioning data in this study click here.]

Aside from scientific evidence, there's deal of realistic-world evidence that masks do nothing to staunch the fan out of disease.

For instance, North Dakota and South Dakota had near-identical vitrine figures, scorn one having a cloak-mandate and the other not:

In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid "cases" than countieswith masqu mandates. And despite masks being really common in Japan, they had their worst flu eruption in decades in 2019.

*

21. Masks are bad for your health. Wearing a mask for long periods, wearing away the same mask more than at one time, and other aspects of textile masks can equal bad for your health. A long study on the detrimental effects of mask-wearing was new publicised by theInternational Journal of Biological science Research and Public Health

Dr. James Meehan reported in August 2020 he was seeing increases in bacterial pneumonia, fungal infections, facial rashes .

Masks are also known to contain plastic microfibers, which damage the lungs when inhaled and may be potentially carcinogenic.

Childen tiring masks encourages mouth-breathing, which results in facial deformities.

Masses around the world have passed out expected to CO2 intoxication while wearing their masks, and some children in China even suffered sudden cardiopulmonary arrest.

*

22. Masks are bad for the planet. Millions upon millions of disposable masks have been used per calendar month for over a twelvemonth. A report from the UN found the Covid19 pandemic will likely result in plastic waste more than doubling in the next few geezerhood., and the vast majority of that is face masks.

The report goes on to warn these masks (and other learned profession waste) will geta sewage and irrigation systems, which will have knock connected effects along public health, irrigation and agriculture.

A study from the University of Swansea found"heavy metals and plastic fibres were released when throw-away masks were swamped in water." These materials are toxicant to some populate and wildlife.

*  *  *

PART Cardinal: VACCINES

23. Covid "vaccines" are totally unprecedented. Before 2020 none productive vaccinum against a human coronavirus had ever been industrial. Since then we have allegedlymade 20 of them in 18 months.

Scientists have been trying to formulate a SARS and MERS vaccine for years with petty winner. Some of the failed SARS vaccines actually caused hypersensitivity to the SARS computer virus. Pregnant that vaccinated mice could possibly baffle the diseasemore severely than unvaccinated mice. Another try out caused colored scathe in ferrets.

While conventional vaccines work by exposing the body to a weakened strain of the microorganism responsible for causing the disease, these new Covid vaccines are mRNA vaccines.

mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccines theoretically cultivate by injecting viral mRNA into the physical structure, where it replicates inside your cells and encourages your body to recognise, and make antigens for, the "spike proteins" of the virus. They have been the subject of inquiry since the 1990s, but ahead 2020 none mRNA vaccine was ever approved for use.

*

24. Vaccines brawl not confer immunity or prevent transmitting. It is readily admitted that Covid "vaccines" donon confer exemption from contagion and donot prevent you from passing the disease onto others. Indeed, an clause in the British Medical Diary highlighted that the vaccine studies were non configured to even strain and assess if the "vaccines" limited transmission.

The vaccine manufacturers themselves, upon releasing the untested mRNA factor therapies, were quite take in their product's "efficacy" was based along "reducing the asperity of symptoms".

*

25. The vaccines were rushed and throw unknown longterm effects.Vaccine development is a dull, gruelling process. Usually, from development through with examination and finally being approved for public use takes many years. The various vaccines for Covid were all developed and authorized in less than a year. Obviously on that point can be no long-run safety device information on chemicals which are less than a class old.

Pfizer even admit this is echt in the leaked supply contract 'tween the pharmaceutical giant, and the government of Republic of Albania:

the semipermanent effects and efficacy of the Vaccinum are not presently known and that there may be harmful effects of the Vaccine that are non currently known

Promote, none of the vaccines own been subject to proper trials. Numerous of them skipped early-stage trials alone, and the late-stage human trials have either non been peer-reviewed, ingest not discharged their data, will non land up until 2023 or were abandoned afterward "severe unfavorable effects".

*

26. Vaccine manufacturers have been granted legal indemnity should they cause harm. The USA's Public Readiness and Parking brake Preparation Act (Homework) grants immunity until at least 2024.

The European Community's product licensing law does the same, and there are reports of confidential liability clauses in the contracts the EU signed with vaccine manufacturers.

The UK went even further, granting standing legal indemnity to the government, and any employees therefrom, for any harm done when a patient is being treated for Covid19 or "suspected Covid19".

Again, the leaked Albanian contract suggests that Pfizer, at any rate, made this indemnity a standard ask of supplying Covid vaccines:

Purchaser hereby agrees to compensate, defend and hold harmless Pfizer […] from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losings, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses

*  *  *

PART VIII: DECEPTION & FOREKNOWLEDGE

27. The EU was preparing "vaccine passports" at least a YEAR before the pandemic began. Proposed COVID countermeasures, conferred to the unexclusive as improvised emergency measures, have existed since ahead the emergence of the disease.

Two European Community documents promulgated in 2018, the"2018 State of Vaccine Confidence" and a technical written report called"Designing and implementing an immunization information system" discussed the plausibleness of an EEC-wide vaccination monitoring organisation.

These documents were combined into the 2019 "Vaccination Roadmap", which (among other things) established a "feasibility study" connected vaccine passports to Menachem Begin in 2019 and finish in 2021:

This report's concluding conclusions were discharged to the public in September 2019, just a month before Event 201 (down the stairs).

*

28. A "training exercise" predicted the pandemic good weeks ahead information technology started. In October 2019 the Macrocosm Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins University held Case 201. This was a training exercise based along a animal disease coronavirus starting a worldwide pandemic. The example was sponsored away the Pecker and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI the vaccinum alliance.

The exercise publicised its findings and recommendations in November 2019 as a "call forth to action". One calendar month advanced, China recorded their first case of "Covid".

*

29. Since the beginning of 2020, the Flu has "disappeared". In the United States, since Februart 2020, influenza cases have allegedly dropped by finished 98%.

It's not upright the The States either, globally flu has apparently almost completely disappeared.

Meanwhile, a new disease called "Covid", which has identical symptoms and a similar mortality to grippe, is purportedly sweeping the Earth.

*

30. The elite group have made fortunes during the pandemic. Since the beginning of lockdown the wealthiest people have become importantly wealthier. Forbes reported that 40 new billionaires have been created "fighting the coronavirus", with 9 of them being vaccine manufacturers.

Business Insider rumored that"billionaires saw their net worth increase by fractional a trillion dollars" by October 2020.

Clearly that number will follow even big by now.

*  *  *

These are the vital facts of the pandemic, presented here as a resource to help formulate and support your arguments with friends surgery strangers. Thanks to all the researchers who have collated and collected this information over the last twenty months, especially European country Policy Research.

Where to Find in Us Micrel Pharmaceutical Products

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/30-facts-you-need-know-covid-cribsheet

Share this post